Skip to content
Company Logo

Overarching Aims, Duties and Principles

Amendment

In April 2024, this chapter was reviewed locally.

April 25, 2024

The aims of adult safeguarding under the Care Act are both reactive and proactive as follows:

  1. To prevent harm and reduce the risk of abuse or neglect to adults with Care and Support needs;
  2. To stop abuse or neglect wherever possible;
  3. To safeguard adults in a way that supports them to make choices and have control about the way they want to live;
  4. To promote an approach that concentrates on improving life for the adult (s) concerned;
  5. To raise public awareness so that communities as a whole, alongside professionals, play their part in preventing, identifying and responding to abuse and neglect;
  6. To provide information and support in accessible ways to help people understand the different types of abuse, how to stay safe and well and what to do to raise a concern about the safety or wellbeing of themselves or another adult; and
  7. To address what has caused the abuse or neglect.

The duty to safeguard an adult applies when all of the following criteria is met:

  1. The adult has needs for Care and Support (whether these have been assessed or are being met by the local authority or not);
  2. They are experiencing, or at risk of experiencing abuse or neglect; and
  3. As a result of Care and Support needs they are unable to protect themselves against the abuse or neglect.

Therefore, an adult at risk could:

  • Be old and frail due to ill health, physical disability or cognitive impairment;
  • Have a learning disability;
  • Have a physical disability and/or a sensory impairment;
  • Have mental health needs including dementia or a personality disorder;
  • Have a long term illness/condition;
  • Misuse substances or alcohol;
  • Be a carer such as a family member/friend who provides personal assistance and care to adults and is subject to abuse;
  • Be unable to demonstrate the capacity to make a decision and is in need of care and support.

Note: An adult is a person aged 18 or above.

1. The adult has needs for Care and Support

The term 'needs for care and support' is not precisely defined within legislation or statutory guidance. Within Gateshead, we adopt the suggested definition contained within Understanding what constitutes a safeguarding concern and how to support effective outcomes (Local Government Association).

Safeguarding duties apply regardless of whether a person's care and support needs are being met, whether by the local authority or anyone else. They also apply to people who pay for their own care and support services.

An adult with care and support needs may be:

  • An older person;
  • Someone with mental health needs, including dementia or a personality disorder;
  • A person with a long-term health condition;
  • Someone who misuses substances or alcohol to the extent that it affects their ability to manage day-to-day living.

Consideration of this need for care and support must be person-centred (for example, not all older people will be in need of care and support but those who are 'frail due to ill health, physical disability or cognitive impairment' may be). The above is not an exhaustive list and it must be considered alongside the impact of needs on the adult's individual wellbeing.

There are 10 areas of potential need (outcomes) set out in the Care Act:

  • Manage and maintain nutrition;
  • Maintain personal hygiene;
  • Manage toilet needs;
  • Being appropriately clothed;
  • Be able to make use of their home safely;
  • Maintain a habitable home environment;
  • Develop/maintain family and other personal relationships;
  • Access/engage in work, training, education or volunteering;
  • Make use of community services;
  • Carry out caring responsibilities for a child.

It must be noted that an individual does not have to be eligible for care and support under the Care and Support (Eligibility Criteria) Regulations 2014 for a safeguarding concern to be raised or for the local authority S42 duty to apply.

If there is reasonable cause to suspect that the adult has needs for care and support then this condition should be deemed as met.

2. The adult is experiencing, or at risk of experiencing abuse or neglect

Partners should not limit their view of what constitutes abuse or neglect, as they can take many forms and the circumstances of individual cases should always be considered.

Responses and decisions should be based on personal circumstances and take into consideration the actual or potential impact on the adult's wellbeing together with their view on the impact that the abuse or neglect has had upon them.

The Care Act 2014 sets out 10 specific categories of abuse and neglect.

For information about these categories, and examples of how the accompanying abuse or neglect may be experienced, see: The Care Act 2014, Categories of Abuse and Neglect.

The diagram below sets out factors that might be considered in making the necessary judgements about 'reasonable cause to suspect'; and whether the situation reflects the statutory criteria:

Diagram source: Making decisions on the duty to carry out Safeguarding Adults enquiries (Local Government Association).

3. As a result of Care and Support needs, the adult is unable to protect themselves against the abuse or neglect

Potential barriers to an adult's ability to protect themselves might include:

  • They do not have the skills, means or opportunity to self-protect;
  • They may have a disability which impairs their capacity to make decisions about protecting themselves or may need support to enact decisions;
  • They live in a group setting where they lack control over the way they are treated or the environment;
  • There is a power imbalance;
  • They may not understand an intention to harm them;
  • They may be trapped in a domestic situation which they are unable to leave, or where coercion and control means they cannot make a decision about making change;
  • Their resilience and resourcefulness to protect themselves from harm is eroded by, for example, coercive control and / or a high risk environment.

An adult's risk of harm is determined by a range of interconnected factors, including personal characteristics, factors associated with their situation or environment and social factors.

Some of these factors are described below:

Personal Characteristics of the adult that may increase their risk of harm may include: Personal Characteristics of the adult that may decrease their risk of harm may include:
  • Not having mental capacity to make decisions about their own safety including fluctuating mental capacity associated with mental illness;
  • Communication difficulties;
  • Physical dependency – being dependent on others for personal care and activities of daily life;
  • Low self-esteem;
  • Experience of abuse;
  • Childhood experience of abuse.
  • Having mental capacity to make own decisions about their own safety;
  • Good physical and mental health;
  • Having no communication difficulties or if so having the right equipment/support;
  • No physical dependency or if needing help, able to self-direct care;
  • Positive former life experiences;
  • Self-confidence and high self-esteem.
Social/situational factors that may increase the risk of abuse may include: Social/situational factors that may decrease the risk of abuse may include:
  • Being cared for in a care setting that is more or less dependent on others;
  • Not getting the right amount or the right kind of care that they need;
  • Isolation and social exclusion;
  • Stigma and discrimination;
  • Lack of access to information and support;
  • Being the focus of anti-social behaviour.
  • Good family relationships;
  • Active social life and a circle of friends;
  • Able to participate in the wider community;
  • Good knowledge and access to the range of community facilities;
  • Remaining independent and active;
  • Access to sources of relevant information.

Wellbeing is the single most important concept of the Care Act. The duty to promote individual wellbeing applies at all times; in every single process, conversation or decision that is made and you must be able to demonstrate that you have done so.

Promoting wellbeing means actively seeking improvements in aspects of wellbeing when carrying out any care and support function. This includes safeguarding.

There are 9 wellbeing domains:

  1. Personal dignity;
  2. Physical or mental health;
  3. Protection from abuse and neglect;
  4. Control over day to day life;
  5. Participation in work, education, training or recreation;
  6. Social and economic wellbeing;
  7. Domestic, family and personal relationships;
  8. Suitability of living accommodation;
  9. Contribution to society.

Under the Care Act the wellbeing domains are all as important as each other. Any hierarchy can only be determined or described by the adult whose wellbeing it is. This means that, even though the process is safeguarding, the 'Protection from abuse and neglect' wellbeing domain may not be the most dominant area of concern for the adult.

It is vital that you understand your duties in relation to promoting individual wellbeing. 

See: The Care Act 2014, Promoting Individual Wellbeing.

As part of the safeguarding process you must understand:

  1. Which areas of wellbeing are most important to the adult at that moment in time;
  2. Which areas of wellbeing are least important at that time;
  3. Whether there are other areas of the adult's life important to them but not listed as a domain (the domains under the Act are not definitive as wellbeing is personal);
  4. Which areas of wellbeing are causing the adult concern or worry;
  5. What impact any concern or worry is having (or could have) across the wellbeing domains (is there a destabilising effect?); and
  6. How the adult thinks any Care and Support needs interact and impact on wellbeing.
  1. Always assume that the adult is best placed to judge their own wellbeing;
  2. Enable the adult to participate as fully as possible in the process and in decision making;
  3. Always seek and take into account the views, wishes and feelings of the adult before making any decision or taking any action;
  4. If a person is unable to express a present view, wish or feeling always take into account any past views, wishes or feelings they have expressed;
  5. Ensure that decisions made have regard for the things that are important to the person and are not based on assumptions, preconceptions or judgements;
  6. Never advocate risk management measures that do not take account of individual Wellbeing;
  7. Work together with other professionals to ensure wellbeing is promoted throughout the safeguarding process;
  8. Work to achieve a balance between the wellbeing of the adult and the wellbeing of any other adults with care and support needs, or any carers;
  9. Minimise restrictions on individual rights or freedoms of the adult.

The Care Act statutory guidance defines 6 principles that should underpin all safeguarding functions, actions and decisions:

  • Empowerment – People being supported and encouraged to make their own decisions and informed consent;
  • Prevention – It is better to take action before harm occurs;
  • Proportionality – Proportionate and least intrusive response appropriate to the risk presented;
  • Protection – Support and representation for those in greatest need;
  • Partnership – Local solutions through services working with their communities. Communities have a part to play in preventing, detecting and reporting neglect and abuse;
  • Accountability – Accountability and transparency in delivering safeguarding.

The principles apply to all sectors and settings including care and support services, commissioning, further education colleges, welfare benefits, housing, regulation and provision of health and care services, social work, healthcare, wider local authority functions and the criminal justice system.

Each principle is accompanied by its own 'I' statement clearly explaining what the principle would feel like in action to an adult affected by safeguarding. Often the principles are referred to solely as 'I' statements.

For more information about these principles see: Six Key Principles that should underpin all Adult Safeguarding Work.

Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) is an approach to safeguarding that is person-led and outcomes-focussed.

It is about having conversations with adults about how responses to safeguarding situations can be made in a way that enhances their involvement, choice and control as well as improving their quality of life, well-being and safety.

It is about seeing adults as experts in their own lives, and working alongside them to identify the outcomes they want.

It focuses on achieving meaningful improvements to adult's lives to prevent abuse and neglect occurring in the future, including ways for them to protect themselves and build resilience.

It recognises that individuals come with a variety of different preferences, histories, circumstances and life-styles; so safeguarding arrangements should not prescribe a process that must be followed whenever a concern is raised, but instead take a more personalised approach.

Making Safeguarding Personal is firmly embedded in the statutory guidance for the Care Act 2014 and is an approach that should flow through every aspect of adult safeguarding, not just formal enquiries.

Making Safeguarding Personal does not mean 'walking away' if a person declines safeguarding support and / or a S42 enquiry. That is not the end of the matter. Empowerment must be balanced for example with Duty of Care and the principles of the Human Rights Act (1998) and of the Mental Capacity Act (2005). The need for balance on this issue is illustrated elsewhere within the Care Act (2014), in section 11, where it is explicit that although the local authority duty to carry out a needs assessment (S9) may be removed if the adult does not consent, this does not apply where the adult is experiencing or at risk of abuse or neglect (S11(2)(b)). In the event that there is no duty under S42 to make enquiries, the practitioner must still consider how any identified risk will be mitigated and how that will be communicated to the adult concerned and the person accused of causing harm.

See: Making Decisions on the Duty to carry out Safeguarding Adults Enquiries (Local Government Association).

Some ways to Make Safeguarding Personal

Some ways to Make Safeguarding Personal

Principles of Engagement

To make safeguarding personal in Gateshead all partners must adopt these principles.

See: Principles of Engagement within the Safeguarding Adults Process.

MSP wider resources

There are a wide range of resources that have been developed by a number of trusted organisations to support effective implementation of the Making Safeguarding Personal approach into practice. These resources can be found in the dedicated section of the Contacts and Practice Resources area.

Effective sharing of information between practitioners and local organisations is essential for early identification of need, assessment and service provision. Safeguarding Adult Reviews have consistently highlighted that missed opportunities to record, understand the significance of and share information in a timely manner can have serious consequences for the safety and wellbeing of adults at risk. The Data Protection Act 2018 and UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are not barriers to collating and sharing information but provide a framework to ensure that personal information about living persons is shared appropriately.

Gateshead Safeguarding Children's Partnership and Safeguarding Adults Board have published a Joint Information Sharing Protocol. This can be found in the Contacts and Practice Resources area.

The Seven golden rules for information sharing provide a useful framework for practitioners. Sharing of information between practitioners and organisations is essential for effective identification, assessment, risk management and service provision. Early sharing of information is the key to providing effective early help where there are emerging problems. Fears about sharing information cannot be allowed to stand in the way of the need to promote the welfare and protect the safety of children and adults.

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a comprehensive statutory framework that:

  1. Protects the autonomy of people who have capacity to make their own decisions; and
  2. Protects people who lack capacity, by ensuring that they are always involved in decisions relating to them, and that any decisions made on their behalf are made in the right way.

The Mental Capacity Act applies whenever:

  1. There are doubts over the ability of any person (from the age of 16) to make a particular decision at a particular time; and
  2. The person has an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of the mind or brain.

The Mental Capacity Act does not apply when:

  1. There are no concerns or doubts about the person's mental capacity; or
  2. The person does not have an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of the mind or brain.

Everyone working with (or caring for) any person from the age of 16 who may lack capacity must comply with the Act and its 5 statutory principles.

If the principles are not clearly applied any decision that is subsequently made on behalf of a person who lacks capacity is not lawful.

  Principle In Practice
1 A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that they lack capacity. Every person from the age of 16 has a right to make their own decisions if they have the capacity to do so. Practitioners and carers must assume that a person has capacity to make a particular decision at a point in time unless it can be established that they do not.
2 A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success. People should be supported to help them make their own decisions. No conclusion should be made that a person lacks capacity to make a decision unless all practicable steps have been taken to try and help them make a decision for themselves.
3 A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because he makes an unwise decision. A person who makes a decision that others think is unwise should not automatically be labelled as lacking the capacity to make a decision.
4 An act done or decision made, under this Act for or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be done, or made, in his best interests. If the person lacks capacity any decision that is made on their behalf, or subsequent action taken must be done using Best Interests, as set out in the Act.
5 Before the act is done, or the decision is made, regard must be had to whether the purpose for which it is needed can be as effectively achieved in a way that is less restrictive of the person's rights and freedom of action. As long as the decision or action remains in the person's Best Interests it should be the decision or action that places the least restriction on their basic rights and freedoms.

For further guidance about the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and how to apply the principles effectively see: The Mental Capacity Act 2005 Resource and Practice Toolkit.

All of the overarching aims, duties and principles of safeguarding apply at every stage and whenever any decision is made, or action taken.

It is therefore essential that decision makers have regard for them before any decision is made (or action taken) and also in the review of any decisions or actions (either as part of the safeguarding process or case audit).

Conversations regarding aims and principles should be clearly recorded in line with local recording requirements.

Last Updated: October 10, 2024

v42